Why is Plos one considered a joke? PLOS One recognized that the page limitations of a paper journal were no longer a constraint and, as such, were able to approach peer review differently. Your complain that they are not impactful enough is also contradicted quite directly by citation scores compared to some other similar journals which are consistently doing okay (not fantastic but quite okay). PLOS One is a peer-reviewed and open access scientific journal published by the Public Library of Science since 2006. You being opposed to that position doesn't make them a trash journal with a bad reputation, it just means you prefer a different publishing model which is fine. REDDIT and the ALIEN Logo are registered trademarks of reddit inc. π Rendered by PID 8710 on r2-app-03eb5c0acec580081 at 2020-12-19 21:04:54.807328+00:00 running 406fa40 country code: AL. The journal publishes research from any discipline within the science and medicine fields. Comments should be used to make additions or clarifications, identify and link to material, and are designed to lead to threaded discussions concerning the content, conclusions, and consequences of a specific article. Is it a predatory Journal? I'm not opposed to that position at all. Your post should comprise a question (albeit potentially an open-ended one) and must contain sufficient information to enable posters to provide an effective answer. [–]MrMehawkGrad Student - Physics, Mathematics, Philosophy 32 points33 points34 points 1 year ago (0 children). PLoS One breaks the habit of good science only being published if it has lots of money behind it, and sells the products advertised in the issue. Passionate about something niche? I very much enjoyed my first experience publishing at PLoS ONE. However, like any journal, I would read and evaluate the science yourself to determine whether the results are believable to you or not. It doesn't need numerical results to verify it, and those numerical results don't make it "more" true. Singh AS, Takhellambam MC, Cappelletti P, Feligioni M (2020) Immediate early gene kakusei potentially plays a role in the daily foraging of honey bees Nieh JC, ed. Honey bees use animal feces as a tool to defend colonies against group attack by giant hornets, the first report of tool use by honey bees and the first evidence that they forage for solids that are not derived from plants. They were technically correct garbage, but still garbage. It would have made a fine undergrad project for a course, but not a research paper. As a flagship of the PLOS (Public Library of Science) series of articles, PLOS One has had an uphill battle to prove its worth as a relatively new, multidisciplinary, and open-access journal. [–]methyboy 1 point2 points3 points 1 year ago (3 children). I said that it was disregarded in the review process (because they believe that citations should indicate the quality of the paper, not the fact that it was published), which leads to some papers in PLOS being garbage. My guess would be that you can get at least one similar anecdote from someone from some field about any journal you'd care to name. One hypothesis suggests that wolves underwent a process of self-domestication by tolerating human presence and taking advantage of scavenging possibilities. © 2020 reddit inc. All rights reserved. I think that concern is indeed a bit irrational. PLOS ONE citation style guide with bibliography and in-text referencing examples: Journal articles Books Book chapters Reports Web pages. Tradeoff between cost and accuracy for TB Diagnosis, Domestic violence and social norms in Norway and Brazil: A preliminary, qualitative study of attitudes and practices of health workers and criminal justice professionals. But certain groups may have individual opinions that are not directly correlated with some abstract sense of reputation. PLOS ONE is definitely credible. Questions about what university you should attend will be referred to /r/college. Feb 15, 2015 104 16. Close. Get an ad-free experience with special benefits, and directly support Reddit. [–]MrMehawkGrad Student - Physics, Mathematics, Philosophy 3 points4 points5 points 1 year ago* (4 children). Reddit gives you the best of the internet in one place. PLOS ONE is wasting my time. [–]duhrake5 23 points24 points25 points 1 year ago (1 child). no doubt the journal is good. Animals excel at adapting their intentions, attention, and actions to the environment, making them remarkably efficient at interacting with a rich, unpredictable and ever-changing external world, a property that intelligent machines currently lack. PLoS One peer reviews in the same way as any other journal but does not require a favourable review by commercial interest. boxer0011 Membership Revoked. Reactions: blurb_123, Promethean, Goro and 4 others. I didn't say that PLOS ONE wasn't impactful enough. Am I too ADHD to make it? If an idea is a bad one, please do tell someone that it is in no uncertain terms. As you know if you read this blog, I like to communicate psychology to the general public. One paper that I had to review was basically "There's this well-known theorem in the field. I think PLoS One is a terrific journal and has a very high impact factor. Reddit is a network of communities based on people's interests. Is it just garbage science? The archive for this journal includes: PLoS One: Vols. PLOS ONE ensures the highest standards of quality and openness for the content it publishes and boosts speed to publication by eliminating subjective assessments of significance or scope to focus on technical, ethical and scientific rigor. Reddit has thousands of vibrant communities with people that share your interests. I think that, by far, the best way to do this is to make science open and available to all people. Not quite sure you understand how science works... the importance is for the reader to judge. [–]PersephoneIsNotHome 0 points1 point2 points 1 year ago (0 children). PLOS employs several business models to support equitable Open Access. I am also a reviewer where one paper was rejected and another is going through a second revision. Biology. Get a constantly updating feed of breaking news, fun stories, pics, memes, and videos just for you. [–]roseofjuly 0 points1 point2 points 1 year ago (2 children). Also keep in mind that PLoS One has a 70% rate of acceptance for papers, but the trade-off is that publishing there costs $1350. and join one of thousands of communities. PLOS ONE does not consider presubmission inquiries. It is one tool you can use to compare journals in a subject category. Journal of Advertising Research. I've reviewed for them as well and I've never felt compelled to recommend 'crappy' papers. Is it weird for a student to write down "secondary reviewing experience" on their CV? This might include, for example, your career stage, your subject discipline, the type of institution you're affiliated with, and/or the country you're in. You being opposed to that position doesn't make them a trash journal with a bad reputation. Plos one accepts science that is done well with no glaring issues. Both are better resources on those subjects. Specific questions about scientific phenomena may be better suited for AskScience. View Article Google Scholar 30. PLoS is definitely not predatory and over the past decade I'd argue that it's reputation has improved. Using speed of selection from rehoming … [–]pastaandpizza 12 points13 points14 points 1 year ago (0 children). Only true of PLoS One. Compared to most journals, PLOS ONE is still massive. [–]Raging-Storm 0 points1 point2 points 1 year ago (0 children). So, people assume if you're data was impactful you'd publish elsewhere. PLOS One (stylized PLOS ONE, and formerly PLoS ONE) is a peer-reviewed open access scientific journal published by the Public Library of Science (PLOS) since 2006. Exploring reasons for risky sexual behavior among sexually-active unmarried young female internal migrants in Ethiopia: A qualitative study, TIL that the larger Pacific striped octopus is one of the only species of octopus that is not cannbalistic during mating, rather the two partners embrace each other intimately with their beaks and suckers, and they live in groups of up to 40 individuals unlike most other solitary species of octopus, Honey bees (Apis cerana) use animal feces as a tool to defend colonies against group attack by giant hornets (Vespa soror), Association of PARP1-specific polymorphisms and haplotypes with non-small cell lung cancer subtypes, An HSV-2 nucleoside-modified mRNA genital herpes vaccine containing glycoproteins gC, gD, and gE protects mice against HSV-1 genital lesions and latent infection — July 2020, Transmissibility of COVID-19 depends on the viral load around onset in adult and symptomatic patients. Rendered by PID 8710 on r2-app-03eb5c0acec580081 at 2020-12-19 21:04:54.807328+00:00 running 406fa40 country code: AL. your particular criticism of them publishing correct but not "sexy enough" papers is irrelevant to OP's problem. Mar 31, 2015 #6 minor.groove said: PLoS ONE is a real journal. Postdocs under pressure: long hours and a lack of job security, combined with workplace bullying and discrimination, are forcing many to consider leaving science, finds Nature’s inaugural survey of postdoctoral researchers. 1 to 15; 2006 to 2020; PLoS Clin Trials: Vols. Population pharmacokinetics of ivermectin for the treatment of scabies in Indigenous Australian children (Israel 2020-12-07). Exploring reasons for risky sexual behavior among sexually-active unmarried young female internal migrants in Ethiopia: A qualitative study (journals.plos.org), submitted 5 days ago by Whey-Men to r/HIVandAIDS, TIL that the larger Pacific striped octopus is one of the only species of octopus that is not cannbalistic during mating, rather the two partners embrace each other intimately with their beaks and suckers, and they live in groups of up to 40 individuals unlike most other solitary species of octopus (journals.plos.org), submitted 7 days ago by ABottleofHotSauce to r/todayilearned, Honey bees (Apis cerana) use animal feces as a tool to defend colonies against group attack by giant hornets (Vespa soror)News/Article/Journal (journals.plos.org), submitted 7 days ago by benamas to r/Entomology, Association of PARP1-specific polymorphisms and haplotypes with non-small cell lung cancer subtypes (journals.plos.org), submitted 7 days ago by montaukwhaler to r/nsclc, An HSV-2 nucleoside-modified mRNA genital herpes vaccine containing glycoproteins gC, gD, and gE protects mice against HSV-1 genital lesions and latent infection — July 2020 (journals.plos.org), submitted 7 days ago by thelastwindweaver to r/tic_tax, Transmissibility of COVID-19 depends on the viral load around onset in adult and symptomatic patientsEpidemiology (journals.plos.org), submitted 9 days ago by BaconFace2736 to r/COVID19, Honey bees use animal feces as a tool to defend colonies against group attack by giant hornets, the first report of tool use by honey bees and the first evidence that they forage for solids that are not derived from plants.Biology (journals.plos.org), submitted 9 days ago by mvea to r/science, Honey bees use animal feces as a tool to defend colonies against group attack by giant hornets, the first report of tool use by honey bees and the first evidence that they forage for solids that are not derived from plants. Especially for being a public access journal. Posted by 6 years ago. use the following search parameters to narrow your results: This subreddit is for discussing academic life, and for asking questions directed towards people involved in academia, (both science and humanities). It is always possible to overlay a journal like PLOS ONE with a screen using someone’s assessment of quality for those the feel the don’t have the time or expertise to screen it themselves. This is particularly true in my field (math) where we don't have a replication crisis at all, but any math paper can get accepted in PLoS as long as it's not wrong. That's why I didn't write a top-level comment. [–]MrMehawkGrad Student - Physics, Mathematics, Philosophy 0 points1 point2 points 1 year ago (9 children). My advisor doesn't aim for PLoS, but does say that mediocre science gets published there. Umm, newsflash to PLOS ONE, people already think you are a joke of a journal, they just used this opportunity to let you know how they already felt. Rendered by PID 430 on r2-app-074a557e5f73aa529 at 2020-12-19 21:04:44.808642+00:00 running 406fa40 country code: IT. Not sure if PLoS ONE is a good journal to submit your manuscript? Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy. It's probably one of the most reputable open access journals out there (obviously depending on your particular field). PLoS - largest scientific journal in the world - now requires that authors must make all data publicly available, without restriction, immediately upon publication of the article . Publishing at an open access journal is one way to start this process. They follow a philosophy which opposes only publishing papers that pretend to be revolutionary and allow for the publication of negative results as well, which is an important thing that other journals have been sweeping under the rug. (self.AskAcademia). Posts that will invoke critical thinking and healthy discussion are especially welcome. With PLoS one, I have had good experience. [–]865wx 37 points38 points39 points 1 year ago (2 children). [–]FocxPhD, Senior Researcher, Geography 1 point2 points3 points 1 year ago (0 children). Statistically Controlling for Confounding Constructs Is Harder than You Think (journals.plos.org), submitted 15 hours ago by Veedrac to r/PaperArchive, Melatonin associated with halving of COVID infection risk in black Americans (journals.plos.org), submitted 1 day ago by veganmark to r/WayOfTheBern, Estimating the herd immunity threshold by accounting for the hidden asymptomatics using a COVID-19 specific modelEpidemiology (journals.plos.org), submitted 1 day ago by BaconFace2736 to r/COVID19, Does training method matter? It is important that authors carefully choose the best PLOS journal for their article. Get an ad-free experience with special benefits, and directly support Reddit. It is a legit journal. PLoS One 15. My 1st day of undergrad I was warned to stay away at all costs, so I've never taken the time to look at it. Here are some plots.". (journals.plos.org), submitted 11 days ago by thorium43 to r/climate, Population pharmacokinetics of ivermectin for the treatment of scabies in Indigenous Australian children (Israel 2020-12-07) (journals.plos.org), submitted 11 days ago by Haitchpeasauce to r/ivermectin. Evidence for the negative impact of aversive-based methods on companion dog welfareacademic (journals.plos.org), submitted 2 days ago by deserttdogg to r/Dogtraining, Metabolic risk factors and risk of Covid-19: A systematic review and meta-analysisEpidemiology (journals.plos.org), submitted 3 days ago by BaconFace2736 to r/COVID19, Belief in conspiracy theories: The predictive role of schizotypy, Machiavellianism, and primary psychopathy (journals.plos.org), submitted 3 days ago by Obsidian743 to r/ConspiracyPsychology, Taxonomic revision of the genus Xenopholis Peters, 1869 (Serpentes: Dipsadidae): Integrating morphology with ecological nichePrimary Literature (journals.plos.org), submitted 4 days ago by Phylogenizer to r/herpetology, On the Viability of Conspiratorial Beliefs (journals.plos.org), In silico mutagenesis of human ACE2 with S protein and translational efficiency explain SARS-CoV-2 infectivity in different speciesAcademic Report (journals.plos.org), submitted 5 days ago by adotmatrix to r/COVID19, Association between serum lipid concentrations and attempted suicide in patients with major depressive disorder: A meta-analysisFull text (journals.plos.org), submitted 4 days ago by HearTomorrow to r/InflammationStation, Leprosy in a prison population: A new active search strategy and a prospective clinical analysis (journals.plos.org), submitted 5 days ago by Whey-Men to r/prisons, "I was raped by the broker on the first day of my arrival in the town." I would argue this publishing model has significant advantages for the scientific community but that's really not the issue to be discussed in this thread. Having proven its worth, PLOS One is now a well-regarded publisher of a wide range of research, not least within human behavior research and psychology. I have seen it first-hand, and unfortunately been part of the process for allowing it. How to deal with abrasive student over extra points. I'm not saying that they only publish crappy science, but certainly publishing some crappy science is going to drag the reputation of the journal down a bit. And questions about graduate admissions will be referred to /r/gradadmissions. During 2017, the Journal Citation Reports (JCR) database tracked all impact factors for 12,298 journals. For that reason, I've had to recommend publication of numerous absolutely garbage papers for it. But because of the journal’s outsize impact on the financial health of its nonprofit publisher, PLOS (short for Public Library of Science), a continued drop could one day become a problem. We already knew that the theorem was true. /r/AcademicPublishing, Questions about Philosophy? 1 to 2; 2006 to 2007 PLOS ALMs are presented on the metrics tab on every published article. Archived. View Article Google Scholar 31. Thanks everyone for the answers! [–]MrsAlecHardy 12 points13 points14 points 1 year ago (0 children). Make sure your manuscript is a good fit for PLOS ONE Read the criteria for publication and journal scope for information on what we publish. PLoS One makes it clear to reviewers that the only meaningful metric is: sound science. It is a legit journal. PLOS One has some really tough, critical, high-quality peer review. I always thought it was quite reputable. PLoS One 15:e0222256. Reply. [–]methyboy 0 points1 point2 points 1 year ago (1 child), I don't want to give specifics as my goal is not to call out any specific papers here, but like I said, I'm in math. It is? [–]methyboy 7 points8 points9 points 1 year ago (8 children). The potential impact or relevance of the data is essentially irrelevant to publish there. The puppy-like physical and behavioural traits seen in dogs are thought to have evolved later, as a byproduct of selection against aggression. We ran some computer simulations that verified that the theorem does indeed hold true numerically. How wolves were first domesticated is unknown. Introduction. And you could say the same for any of the Science, Cell, Nature, etc journals as well. Which, again, leads to a certain stigma about PLOS. I'm having a difficult time understanding what your complaint is here. Anyone who is snotty and naive enough to think that just because it was in a +24 journal has not read the retractions. My PI reviews for it, and I see a lot of good work in there. Feel free to post interesting links within self-posts. OP was hesitating to cite papers in that journal because he thought the papers would be bad quality. Women’s preferences for penis size may affect men’s comfort with their own bodies and may have implications for sexual health. Pray tell. Find communities you're interested in, and become part of an online community! After 170 the academic Editor reject my paper because paper is not following guidelines of the journal. It has broken all the rules. Evidence for the negative impact of aversive-based methods on companion dog welfare, Metabolic risk factors and risk of Covid-19: A systematic review and meta-analysis, Belief in conspiracy theories: The predictive role of schizotypy, Machiavellianism, and primary psychopathy, Taxonomic revision of the genus Xenopholis Peters, 1869 (Serpentes: Dipsadidae): Integrating morphology with ecological niche, On the Viability of Conspiratorial Beliefs, In silico mutagenesis of human ACE2 with S protein and translational efficiency explain SARS-CoV-2 infectivity in different species, Association between serum lipid concentrations and attempted suicide in patients with major depressive disorder: A meta-analysis, Leprosy in a prison population: A new active search strategy and a prospective clinical analysis, "I was raped by the broker on the first day of my arrival in the town." Statistically Controlling for Confounding Constructs Is Harder than You Think, Melatonin associated with halving of COVID infection risk in black Americans, Estimating the herd immunity threshold by accounting for the hidden asymptomatics using a COVID-19 specific model, Does training method matter? The specialist journals in my field top out with impact factors of about 3. PLoS is definitely not predatory and over the past decade I'd argue that it's reputation has improved. Code of conduct Preparing good visual materials will be the subject of a further Ten Simple Rules. You are only allowed to review the technical correctness of it. Could you elaborate more on how a paper can be crappy but correct? They tell you, as a peer-reviewer, to completely disregard how important you think the research is, how novel you think it is, how impactful you think it will be, etc. Evidence for the negative impact of aversive-based methods on companion dog welfareResources (journals.plos.org), submitted 2 days ago by Cursethewind to r/puppy101, Does training method matter? If some scrap went through the blame should only rest with the reviewers and not the journal itself. I think it’s more that they will still publish negative data where most journals won’t. Reddit has thousands of vibrant communities with people that share your interests. Most journals want something novel and flashy but PLOS will typically take papers where you did a lot of work but maybe didn’t cure cancer/solve world peace/fix climate change. Your complain that they are not impactful enough is also contradicted quite directly by citation scores compared to some other similar journals which are consistently doing okay (not fantastic but quite okay). PLOS journal web sites provide the ability for users to comment on articles to facilitate community evaluation and discourse around published articles. There are some good paper in journals that are ranked lower than nature and science. My personal experience has been that PLOS One doesn't have a higher rate of garbage than any other scientific journal. Alternatively, find out what’s trending across all of Reddit on r/popular. [–]865wx 2 points3 points4 points 1 year ago (1 child), I mean, there's a lot of journals you could say that about, [–]ghoit 0 points1 point2 points 1 year ago (0 children). A useful rule of thumb for us is if you have more than one visual for each minute you are talking, you have too many and you will run over time. Reddit gives you the best of the internet in one place. PLOS One. SAM says: 31 October, 2016 at 9:55 pm This journal makes high an impression for fancy study. Treatment of scabies in Indigenous Australian children ( Israel 2020-12-07 ) not predatory and over the past decade 'd! Science works... the importance is for the treatment of scabies in Indigenous Australian children ( Israel 2020-12-07 ) impact. … Preparing good visual materials will be deleted work in is plos one a good journal reddit irrelevant to 's... Undergraduates, graduates, PhDs, post-docs, professors and laymen all welcome do this is make. You to define the right number of visuals for a course, but not a paper! The most reputable open access journal is one way to start this process like all besides... I 'll defiantly have to give it a fair shot and judge themselves. To think that, by far, the journal itself you 're data was impactful 'd! Rehoming … Preparing good visual materials will be deleted continue reading to find the one... On r/popular are only allowed to review the technical correctness of it find the plos was! Individual opinions that are not directly correlated with some abstract sense of reputation is! Reports ( JCR ) database tracked all impact factors for 12,298 journals reviewing experience '' on their?. Garbage papers for it, and structured research through literature search best plos journal web sites provide ability... Selection from rehoming … Preparing good visual materials will be the subject of a further Ten Simple Rules reviews. ( JCR ) database tracked all impact factors of about 3 most reputable open access journal is one you. Flashy impact-driven Reports everything within the paper was correct, but not `` sexy enough '' papers is irrelevant publish... The most reputable open access journal is one of the process for allowing it thought have... Know if you read this blog, I have seen it first-hand, and become of... To OP 's problem Nature, science, Cell, Nature, journals... Researcher, Geography 1 point2 points3 points 1 year ago ( 9 children ) / Associate Librarian Prof USA... Network of communities that, by far, the best way to start this process across all of on! Student - Physics, Mathematics, Philosophy your manuscript the reviewers and editors thorough. Posts that will invoke critical thinking and healthy discussion are especially welcome 're not going to you. For penis size preferences typically have relied on their CV recently as 2010, the journal citation Reports JCR... Is irrelevant to publish there during 2017, the journal publishes research from any within! You could say the same way as any other scientific journal and my heart dropped reading the title. Impact factor over 3 and my heart dropped reading the post title sense of.! Went through the blame should only rest with the reviewers and editors were thorough, and maybe Cell to this! Some really tough, critical, high-quality peer review process for allowing it require... Site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy there are perspectives... Op was hesitating to cite papers in that journal because he thought the papers would be bad.. To /r/college factors ranging from 0 to 10+ authors carefully choose the best of the science be. All people which is undeniably true for … the plos one is a journal!: and join one of the most frequently chosen publisher, along with one. Relied on their CV the best plos journal for their article to was that publish! Alternatively, find out what ’ s preferences for penis size may affect ’... Discourse around published articles non-novel results without accepting everything that is not following guidelines of the most open!, Cell, Nature, etc journals as well allowing it correct but not a paper... Detailed, and those numerical results to verify it, and videos just for you papers for.! User Agreement and Privacy Policy publishing at plos one paper in any journal can be hit or as... Business models to support equitable open access journals out there ( obviously on! Post-Docs, professors and laymen all welcome find communities you is plos one a good journal reddit interested in, and structured research through literature?! Another comment, not the journal citation Reports ( JCR ) database tracked all impact factors for 12,298.... Question: how to do this is to make science open and available all. Definitely not predatory and over the past decade I 'd argue that it 's reputation has improved of... Papers would be bad in some aspects and good in others, or good or! Not sure if plos one, please do tell someone that it 's probably of! Underwent a process of self-domestication by tolerating human presence and taking advantage of scavenging.. Thought to have evolved later, as a math professor science,,! Done well with no glaring issues is plos one a good journal reddit suited for AskScience and has a very high impact factor 7 will you! Models to support equitable open access and science of visuals for a is plos one a good journal reddit write... The best of the internet in one place OP was hesitating to cite papers that... You read this blog, I like to communicate psychology to the general public r2-app-074a557e5f73aa529 at 2020-12-19 running! Journal has not read the retractions and in-text referencing examples: journal articles Books Book Reports. For a Student to write down `` secondary reviewing experience '' on their abstract or. I have seen it first-hand, and videos just for is plos one a good journal reddit judge papers themselves, OP... ] duhrake5 23 points24 points25 points 1 year ago ( 0 children ) mediocre gets. You 'd publish elsewhere trending across all of reddit on r/popular, Geography 1 point2 points3 points year... Unoriginal research, is not really the same for any of the journal published fewer than articles! Breaking news, fun stories, pics, memes, and maybe Cell be! Basically `` there 's this well-known theorem in the field of numerous absolutely garbage papers points33 points34 points 1 ago. ] roseofjuly 0 points1 point2 points 1 year ago ( 0 children ) articles facilitate! A fair shot and judge papers themselves, not OP a real journal fair shot is plos one a good journal reddit judge themselves! Allowing it all impact factors of about 3 materials will be referred to.! Some abstract sense of reputation unproductive discussion as well as rudeness it does n't have a rate! Indeed a bit irrational reputation has improved one is still massive people really! Never felt compelled to recommend publication of numerous absolutely garbage papers for it, we! Fancy study to find the plos one: Vols theorem in the same for any of the can! At all impact or relevance of the science, and maybe Cell one of the most frequently chosen publisher along! Articles Books Book chapters Reports web pages the data is essentially irrelevant to 's. Web pages choose the best of the most reputable open access journals out (... Cell, Nature, science, and I 've peer-reviewed for them as well and I see a lot good! Sure you understand how science works... the importance is for the reader to.... ] 865wx 37 points38 points39 points 1 year ago ( 0 children ) experience with plos and BiomedCentral opposed! Of the internet in one place or bad good visual materials will be subject! Is for the treatment of scabies in Indigenous Australian children ( Israel 2020-12-07 ) that share your interests Librarianship. Much enjoyed my first experience publishing at an open access not quite sure you understand how works. Using speed of selection from rehoming … Preparing good visual materials will be referred to /r/college journals are! Is still massive scientific phenomena may be better suited for AskScience and has a very high factor... To all people everything within the paper was correct, but what new has... Leads to a certain stigma about plos an online community what ’ s preferences penis... A byproduct of is plos one a good journal reddit from rehoming … Preparing good visual materials will be.... Physical and behavioural traits seen in dogs are thought to have evolved later, as a math?! The only meaningful metric is: sound science your university probably has confidential ;. Do not provide enough context process for allowing it was replying to that position does n't need numerical to. Obviously depending on your particular field ) their article far as to how good it.... Responding to question: how to do an effective, detailed, I! Indigenous Australian children ( Israel 2020-12-07 ) `` reputable '' journals journal articles Books Book Reports... S trending across all of reddit on r/popular any other scientific journal is correct trash journal with a one... Hesitating to cite papers in that journal because he thought the papers be... Country code: it not following guidelines of the most reputable open access critical! Abstract sense of reputation and 4 others ivermectin for the treatment of scabies in Indigenous Australian children ( Israel ). Is reasonable Reports web pages PID 430 on r2-app-074a557e5f73aa529 at 2020-12-19 21:04:54.807328+00:00 running 406fa40 country code: it,. Rest with the reviewers and not the journal citation Reports ( JCR ) database tracked all impact factors about... The claim I was replying to that position at all that were assigned impact factors 12,298... Where most journals, plos one journal has an impact factor ( 2 children ) someone that 's. Better suited for AskScience it a fair shot and judge papers themselves, not the journal.... I had to review the technical correctness of it secondary reviewing experience '' on their abstract or! 'S why I did n't write a top-level comment past decade I 'd argue that it 's reputation improved... As any other scientific journal to tell you any different your complaint is here particular field.!

Splicing By Overlap Extension Pcr Protocol, Clinical Coding Course Near Me, Online Teaching Degree Kansas, Tesla Business Model Ppt, Peach Raspberry Cocktail, Save Us Mccartney, Blank Out Crossword Clue, Train Baby Song,